SI Vault
 
Foot Dragging
Chris Ballard
July 16, 2001
Every four years U.S. soccer fans have been reasonably confident that they'd be able to see the World Cup on live, English-language broadcasts. Until now, that is. Though the U.S. team has had a surprising run in the qualifying tournament (below, midfielder Chris Armas, right, fended off Jamaica's forward Wolde Harris in their 0-0 tie on June 16) and is a virtual lock to advance, there is still no assurance that English-language coverage will be available next June when the Cup begins in Japan and South Korea.
Decrease font Decrease font
Enlarge font Enlarge font
July 16, 2001

Foot Dragging

View CoverRead All Articles

Every four years U.S. soccer fans have been reasonably confident that they'd be able to see the World Cup on live, English-language broadcasts. Until now, that is. Though the U.S. team has had a surprising run in the qualifying tournament (below, midfielder Chris Armas, right, fended off Jamaica's forward Wolde Harris in their 0-0 tie on June 16) and is a virtual lock to advance, there is still no assurance that English-language coverage will be available next June when the Cup begins in Japan and South Korea.

To understand why, one has to follow a twisted trail. Initially, FIFA, soccer's international governing body, planned to use a Swiss-based company called ISL/ISMM to sell television rights to the World Cup, but in March ISL/ISMM filed for bankruptcy. Forced to scramble, FIFA in May sold U.S. and European television rights to German media company Kirch, which announced that it expected to nail down a deal with a U.S. network by June. Then Kirch exercised an option to buy the remainder of ISL/ISMM's world rights. Amid the turmoil, little progress was made on U.S. negotiations. "They've been delayed for a long time, and, obviously, that has hurt everybody," says Bob Yalen, director of brand management at ESPN, which in conjunction with sister network ABC is the front-runner to purchase the rights. (ABC broadcast the 1994 and '98 Cups.)

A complicating factor is the time difference—most World Cup games will begin in the dead of night here, in the infomercial graveyard of 2 a.m. to 5 a.m. That means a network has to hope people will buy a six-pack of Jolt and tune in during the wee hours. If it tape-delays the action, it risks sending hard-core fans to Univision, the Spanish-language channel that will show all 64 games live.

Barring a collapse by the U.S. team in qualifying—in which case networks would probably back off and fans would have to choose between Univision and pay-per-view—or an unanticipated roadblock by Kirch, expect ABC/ ESPN to buy the rights and show all games live. "With Univision doing it [live], we'd have to go live [too]," says Yalen. It's unlikely a deal will be sealed until September. Until then, U.S. fans can only wait, hope and, just in case, practice their Spanish.

1