What Went Wrong in Michigan State's Near Second-Half Collapse Against Purdue

Michigan State excelled in the first half and slowed down after halftime.
Michigan State's Brennan Parachek, left, catches a pass as Purdue's Hudson Miller defends during the fourth quarter on Friday, Nov. 22, 2024, at Spartan Stadium in East Lansing.
Michigan State's Brennan Parachek, left, catches a pass as Purdue's Hudson Miller defends during the fourth quarter on Friday, Nov. 22, 2024, at Spartan Stadium in East Lansing. / Nick King/Lansing State Journal / USA TODAY NETWORK via Imagn Images

Michigan State entered halftime with a commanding 24-3 lead over Purdue, showcasing an impressive first-half performance that had fans and analysts alike believing they were in complete control.

The Spartans' offense was clicking on all cylinders, mixing effective passing with a strong rushing attack, while the defense stifled Purdue’s offensive efforts, limiting the Boilermakers to just a single field goal. Quarterback Aidan Chiles was sharp, leading the offense with poise and precision, and running back Kay’Ron Lynch-Adams was churning out consistent yardage, while other running back Nate Carter scored twice giving Michigan State a clear advantage.

But as the second half unfolded, it became evident that the Spartans' momentum had stalled. Michigan State failed to add any more points after halftime, while Purdue, led by quarterback Hudson Card, began to find their rhythm. The Boilermakers, despite their struggles in the first half, adjusted and capitalized on a few Michigan State mistakes, cutting the lead to 24-17 with two quick touchdowns. The Spartans, who had been dominant early, seemed to lose their edge, allowing Purdue to gain confidence and inch closer to what would have been a stunning comeback.

The key issue for Michigan State was a noticeable letdown in its execution. The Spartans ' offense became stagnant after controlling the game's tempo in the first half. It couldn't sustain drives, and the play-calling seemed overly conservative, lacking the urgency to keep Purdue at bay.

The defense, which had been dominant in the first two quarters, appeared fatigued and vulnerable as Purdue’s offense found success, especially with big plays in the passing game. Michigan State’s inability to adjust to the Boilermakers' offensive adjustments allowed Purdue to crawl back into the game.

Despite a few late-game stops, Michigan State’s lack of scoring in the second half and its failure to finish the game in dominant fashion was a missed opportunity. While the defense did hold on for the win, the second-half collapse highlighted an issue: the inability to maintain focus and intensity when it the game well in hand. The Spartans ultimately won 24-17, but the near collapse against a Purdue team they had dominated early left a bitter taste.

It was a reminder that no lead is safe in college football and that maintaining consistency and putting teams away is just as important as starting strong.

Don’t forget to follow the official Spartan Nation Page on Facebook Spartan Nation WHEN YOU CLICK RIGHT HERE, and be a part of our vibrant community group Go Green Go White as well WHEN YOU CLICK RIGHT HERE.


Published