So-called 'worst rule in football' is in the headlines again after Bills-Chiefs
The fumble rule dubbed "the worst in football" is once again in the headlines after Sunday night's playoff game between the Buffalo Bills and Kansas City Chiefs.
During the 4th quarter, Chiefs receiver Mecole Hardman fumbled the ball as he was brought to the ground just short of a touchdown, with the ball bouncing into the end zone and then out of bounds.
This in turn resulted in a touchback and a turnover in favor of the Bills, whereas a fumble out of bounds anywhere else on the field other than the end zone would have seen Kansas retain possession at the point of the fumble.
Ultimately it didn't matter as the Chiefs held on to beat the Bills, but given how incredibly tight the game was, there was a chance it could have proven a decisive moment.
And this also happened during the regular season to the Minnesota Vikings, with Justin Jefferson judged to have fumbled out of bounds through the end zone against the Philadelphia Eagles in Week 2 when the Vikings were down 10-7 and later lost the game.
The incident sparked complaints about the rule then, and more complaints followed on Sunday night, with ESPN's Jeremy Fowler going so far as to suggest the rule will be repealed in the offseason (presumably because it happened to NFL darlings the Chiefs).
But as ever the delights of social media provides ample opportunity to disagree, with many in favor of keeping the rule as a punishment for teams that fail to protect the football so close to the end zone.
Some have also suggested a potential alternative so instead of a devastating turnover of possession, the fumbling team could instead be given a 10-yard penalty and a loss of down.
We'll now have to keep an eye on rule changes in the offseason, with indications pointing towards an end to the rule.