Mark Sanchez's Past, Present and (Lack of) Future

By all accounts, he's played his last game in New York. It's been a tumultuous couple of years for Sanchez and the Jets, but did the franchise play its cards correctly?
Mark Sanchez's Past, Present and (Lack of) Future
Mark Sanchez's Past, Present and (Lack of) Future /

Mark Sanchez is eligible to the field this season, but don't count on it happening.

Mark Sanchez is eligible to the field this season, but don't count on it happening.

At times in the NFL there are awkward periods of time when a team clearly wants to move on from players representing its recent past as it looks to the future. It occurs with every team at some point—I saw it firsthand at the Packers during the transition from Brett Favre to Aaron Rodgers—and it is now happening with the Jets and Mark Sanchez.

This week the Jets placed Sanchez on injured reserve, with the return designation that allows him to possibly play again in eight weeks. While both sides are saying the right things and being professional and courteous, the relationship is headed for inevitable divorce. In removing the emotion, let’s step back and take a measured look at the organizational decision-making with Sanchez, past, present and (lack of) future.

Behind the extension

In 2012 Sanchez had two years left on a lucrative rookie contract signed in 2009; he was in the penultimate “bonus baby” class prior to the CBA rookie “correction.” There did not appear to be any grousing from Sanchez for an extension nor urgency for a contract adjustment. Then something happened: the Colts cut Peyton Manning, causing a seismic outpouring of team affection. Not surprisingly, the Jets, who had in recent years taken big swings at quarterback—trading for Brett Favre and moving up for Sanchez—expressed interest.

Although the flirtation was fleeting and the Jets were never considered a serious contender to sign Manning, Sanchez was aware the Jets had “cheated” on their starting quarterback. Facing this low rumble of discontent and knowing that Sanchez was their quarterback, for better or worse, the Jets negotiated an extension with Sanchez to (1) smooth any lingering tension from the brief Manning courtship; (2) provide necessary cap relief and (3) secure additional contract years beyond 2013.

The deal

Five Thoughts on Week 2

1. I think RG3 is stuck in second gear. As I wrote last month, the narrative on his return to play last season is still muddled, and it does not appear that he has sufficiently healed this year. The bigger fear, however, is that he has healed. In that case, the injury from last year’s playoff game against the Seahawks, which could have been avoided, may have robbed Griffin—and Redskins fans—of a truly special talent.

2. I think the Chargers, who had become stale in recent years under the AJ Smith/Norv Turner regime, have renewed energy under the fresh faces of general manager Tom Telesco and coach Mike McCoy. It is very early, but things are on the uptick in San Diego.

3. I think although the Packers lost receivers Donald Driver to retirement and Greg Jennings to free agency they are just as, if not more, explosive. James Jones, Jordy Nelson and Randall Cobb are potent homegrown weapons for Aaron Rodgers. The Packers diligently work on a constant pipeline of talent to fill any departures.

4.I think Kenny Britt’s tweet, "Looking like this the last year ill be sayin 'TitanUp," is telling for both he and the team. Britt may be getting the "Sanchez treatment" described above, a clear vibe that he is not part of the Titans’ future.

5. I think Darrelle Revis, glad to be out of New York, is less than convincing in refuting rumors he is unhappy in his new surroundings in Tampa. He tweeted "I'm happy to be a Buccaneer and a resident of Tampa." Brandtslation: "I'm making $16 million with no state income tax."

As NFL teams do all the time, the Jets made a bet. The bet was simple: Mark Sanchez would be their starting quarterback for the 2012 and 2013 seasons. From the outside looking in, this was not a poor business decision, although not one that was required. The detail where the Jets went too far, however, was the lack of offset in the 2013 guarantee. Let’s examine:

2012

Prior to the extension, Sanchez was scheduled to make $11.75 million. After the extension, Sanchez made the same $11.75 million! The Jets simply moved money around to provide Sanchez an immediate bonus, cutting $6.4 million from their bloated cap (and adding it to future years) in the process. With Sanchez secure at quarterback, and no other viable options, the impact on 2012 was nominal.

2013

Herein lies the rub.

Sanchez went from making a nonguaranteed $6 million to fully guaranteed $8.25 million, money that would not be offset by any earnings from a new team were he to be released and latch on elsewhere. Thus, Sanchez was to make $8.25 million in 2013 whether he was on the Jets, another team, or no team. This clause turned out to have great value for Sanchez, ensuring his continued presence on the team, at least for this year.

2014-2016

The Jets secured three additional years worth approximately $37 million, not an unreasonable amount for a respectable starting quarterback (I know there is debate here on whether Sanchez qualifies as that). From Jets’ management perspective, they were exchanging one guaranteed year for three additional nonguaranteed years at a (relatively) reasonable rate. However, that was then, this is now.

I understand the bet the Jets made 18 months ago on Sanchez, saying “We’ll ride this guy for two years, and if he’s any good we’ll have him three more years.” Unfortunately, Sanchez’s performance soured since that bet was made leading, in good part, to the hiring of a new, future-focused regime. Now, the chances of Sanchez seeing that $37 million are as likely as, well, you or I seeing it. Speaking of which ...

Meet the new boss

Incoming general manager John Idzik brings a stoic presence to a team trying to shake the drama of the recent past. Idzik quickly moved on from the failed one-year Tim Tebow experiment, silenced annual rumbles of discontent from Darrelle Revis by trading him and reduced coach Rex Ryan’s influence by establishing clear separation between management and coaching. Indeed, the reason Idzik had no problem with Ryan attending his son’s game on cutdown day was more than needed family time: Ryan was not needed to set the roster, only to coach it.


Published
Andrew Brandt
ANDREW BRANDT

Andrew Brandt is the executive director of the Moorad Center for the Study of Sports Law at Villanova University and a contributing writer at Sports Illustrated. He has written a "Business of Football" column for SI since 2013. Brandt also hosts a "The Business of Sports" podcast and publishes a weekly newsletter, "The Sunday Seven." After graduating from Stanford University and Georgetown Law School, he worked as a player-agent, representing NFL players such as Boomer Esiason, Matt Hasselbeck and Ricky Williams. In 1991, he became the first general manager of the World League's Barcelona Dragons. He later joined the Green Bay Packers, where he served as vice president and general counsel from 1999 to 2008, negotiating all player contracts and directing the team's football administration. He worked as a consultant with the Philadelphia Eagles and also has served as an NFL business analyst for ESPN.