Women's World Cup Draw: USWNT Gets Thailand, Chile and Old Foe Sweden

The defending women’s World Cup champion United States drew Sweden, Chile and Thailand in Group F for next summer’s World Cup in France at the draw in Paris on Saturday. It's an interesting group, where Jill Ellis's squad will have a chance for redemption against a familiar rival.

The defending women’s World Cup champion United States drew Sweden, Chile and Thailand in Group F for next summer’s World Cup in France at the draw in Paris on Saturday. It's an interesting group, where Jill Ellis's squad will have a chance for redemption against a familiar rival.  

Here are three thoughts on the draw:

U.S. in line for easy advancement, but an old foe awaits

Chile and Thailand shouldn’t pose a significant challenge for the U.S., but it’s hard not to laugh seeing Sweden yet again as a group-stage opponent. This will be the fifth straight World Cup that the U.S. and Sweden have met in the group stage, and it will also be a rematch of the 2016 Olympic quarterfinal in which the Swedes stunningly eliminated the U.S. on penalties. (You might also recall that being the game in which U.S. goalkeeper Hope Solo famously called the Swedes “cowards” for their defensive-minded approach to the match.)

"I just knew they were going to be in our group," 2015 Women's World Cup hero Carli Lloyd said following the draw. "I think obviously, looking back to the last big tournament, we have that bad taste in our mouth from the last time we played them. For us, it's even more motivation. People say 'Oh, they're World Cup champions' but people forget that the Olympics was the most recent tournament. It was a difficult game and we didn't want to get out when we did, so I think having Sweden in our group adds the challenge."

The U.S. also gets to play its group games entirely in the north of France and starts with two relatively easy ones, vs. Thailand on June 11 in Reims, vs. Chile on June 16 in Paris and then vs. Sweden on June 20 in Le Havre.

CONFIRMED:

Here are your groups for the FIFA Women's World Cup France 2019! 🇫🇷#FIFAWWC pic.twitter.com/bz5ZghPZ1C

— FIFA Women's World Cup (@FIFAWWC) December 8, 2018

For U.S, finishing second would likely provide an easier path

If the U.S. wins Group F, it could face a potential knockout-round path of Spain or Germany in the round of 16, host France in the quarterfinals and England or Japan in the semifinals. But if the U.S. finishes second in Group F, the path would be potentially somewhat easier, with Canada or the Netherlands in the round of 16, Germany or Spain in the quarterfinals and Australia or Brazil in the semis.

You never know how the group results are going to break out, of course, and there’s no way the U.S. would try not to win the group, but the penalty for a hiccup against Sweden might not be that big at all.

"I think you see the group and frame it as how it's going to be the most beneficial to you," Tobin Heath said. "I think finishing second is never the USA's mentality; we always want to finish first. In a World Cup you're going to have to face the best teams. So, whether you're facing those difficult teams right off the bat or more towards the end of the tournament hopefully, that's where we want to be."

WAHL:U.S. Soccer Foundation Sues U.S. Soccer Federation Over Naming, Logo Dispute

The draw didn’t do host France any favors

The French probably have the most difficult group of the bunch, with South Korea, Norway and Nigeria, and having to potentially face the U.S. in the quarterfinals is no gift at all for them. The easiest group overall might just be the one the U.S. is in, though Thailand appears to have improved in the last four years since its World Cup debut in 2015.

England and Scotland drawing the same group is intriguing, and the most balanced group overall might be the one with Canada, Cameroon, New Zealand and the Netherlands. In the big picture, though, FIFA has improved its draw process immeasurably on the women’s and men’s sides by making all the draw pots (not just the one with the top seeds) based on the FIFA rankings and not just by geography. That creates more balance, and that’s a good thing.