Novak Djokovic beats Roger Federer to advance to Australian Open final

Novak Djokovic defeated Roger Federer 6–1, 6–2, 3–6, 6–3 in the semifinals to advance to his sixth Australian Open final.

Jon Wertheim | Jan 28, 2016

Novak Djokovic beats Roger Federer to advance to Australian Open final /

MELBOURNE – Three quick thoughts from Novak Djokovic’s statement in the form of a 6–1, 6–2, 3–6, 6–3 win over Roger Federer in Thursday night's Australian Open men's semifinals.

• Earlier in the day on Thursday, the cynosure of the women’s game turned a thoroughly dominating set of tennis against a highly credible opponent. Serena Williams blanked Aga Radwanska, 6–0, in roughly the time it takes to make a sandwich. Tonight, the cynosure of the men’s game may have topped her. For 22 minutes, Novak Djokovic wasn’t good; he was unplayable. He won 24 points to Federer’s 11, broke serve twice and committed only two unforced errors. The scoreline of 6–1 belied the lopsidedness.

Serena Williams routs Agnieszka Radwanska, into Australian Open final

Djokovic played a set that ought to be preserved in amber, demoralizing his opponent. The second set was more of the same, Djokovic winning 6–2. Buoyed by the crowd, Federer clawed his back, winning the third. Then Djokovic, steadied, played a terrific return game at 4–3 and closed out the match. Sometimes in tennis, you watch a player compete at a dizzying level and simply say, “too good.” For much of the match, it was “too great.”

LISANTI: Murray, Raonic face off for right to play Djokovic

• At odds with his age, Federer played terrific tennis here before this point. In his first five matches, he dropped just one set. He spent far less time on court than Djokovic did. He endured no drama on the order of Djokovic’s unsightly 100-error, five-set squeak out against Gilles Simon. As one former major winner put it before the match, “It’s been a while since Federer came in looking so good and Djokovic looking so ordinary." Which must have made Thursday night's defeat all the more demoralizing. Federer positioned himself perfectly to spring the upset. And then….he never even got his teeth into the first two sets. He rallied in the third. He played a few loose points in the fourth and…poof. And while head-to-heads can be misleading and are statistically problematic, we’re duty bound to point that Federer now has a losing record against both Rafael Nadal and Djokovic.

[tweet=https://twitter.com/TheCauldron/status/692663419846004736]

Angelique Kerber to make Slam final debut with win over Johanna Konta

• The defending champ, clear-cut No.1 and five-time winner here in Melbourne, Djokovic was the favorite to win this tournament two weeks ago. While his level dipped in the middle rounds, he’s playing at an almost comical level now. Though he spent too much time on the court in the middle rounds, the short night matches in the quarterfinals (against Kei Nishikori) and against Federer on Thursday night ought to help preserve battery power. (Plus he now has two days off before the final.) His confidence is swollen, as it ought to be. This match doubled as a mic-drop statement. All of which is to say: Djokovic has put himself in an ideal position to win the title yet again.

Snapshots from Djokovic vs. Federer

Australian Open semifinals: Djokovic vs. Federer

Roger Federer, Novak Djokovic

Roger Federer, Novak Djokovic

Roger Federer

Novak Djokovic

Novak Djokovic

Roger Federer

Novak Djokovic

Roger Federer

Novak Djokovic, Roger Federer

Roger Federer

Novak Djokovic

Roger Federer

Novak Djokovic

Roger Federer

Novak Djokovic

Roger Federer

Novak Djokovic

Roger Federer

Novak Djokovic

Novak Djokovic, Roger Federer

Novak Djokovic

Roger Federer, Novak Djokovic

Novak Djokovic

Published Jan 28, 2016

JON WERTHEIM

Jon Wertheim is a senior writer for Sports Illustrated and has been part of the full-time SI writing staff since 1997, largely focusing on the tennis beat , sports business and social issues, and enterprise journalism. In addition to his work at SI, he is a correspondent for "60 Minutes" and a commentator for The Tennis Channel. He has authored 11 books and has been honored with two Emmys, numerous writing and investigative journalism awards, and the Eugene Scott Award from the International Tennis Hall of Fame. Wertheim is a longtime member of the New York Bar Association (retired), the International Tennis Writers Association and the Writers Guild of America. He has a bachelor's in history from Yale University and received a law degree from the University of Pennsylvania. He resides in New York City with his wife, who is a divorce mediator and adjunct law professor. They have two children.