The truth about Atlanta's willingness to spend this offseason

Just because the Braves haven't spent money on a top-tier starter in free agency doesn't mean they haven't spent money this offseason

There's this idea amongst the Atlanta Braves fanbase this winter, mostly contained on social media, that the team and president of baseball operations Alex Anthopoulos is being "cheap" by not breaking the bank for some of the top tier free agents that have signed. 

To recap some of those signings: 

Aaron Nola signed first, going back to the Philadelphia Phillies on a seven year deal worth $172M. (For what it's worth, Atlanta reportedly outbid Philly for Nola's services, but he chose to stay home.) Sonny Gray was the next to sign, taking $75M for a three-year deal with the St. Louis Cardinals. 

And then the Shohei Ohtani deal happened. Ten years, $700M, with an astounding $680M deferred, bringing the luxury tax calculation down to $46M a year. 

(Worth noting - all of those free agents received qualifying offers and would have required the Braves to sacrifice their 2nd and 5th-highest draft picks in the 2024 MLB Draft were they to sign with Atlanta.)

We've also seen lots of third tier (and fourth tier) pitchers sign, as well, including Seth Lugo, Eduardo Rodriguez, Michael Wacha, Kenta Maeda, Tyler Mahle, and Jack Flaherty. 

When you look across the ecosystem of Braves fans and where they congregate online (twitter and facebook groups, mostly, but occasionally on reddit as well), there's quite a bit of angst that Atlanta's being "cheap" by not outbidding other teams for these starters that are entering their early 30s (or, in the case of Sonny Gray, already 33 when signing). 

But in reality, the Braves have been plenty active this offseason and have committed significant amounts of money, relative to the rest of baseball. 

The average MLB team has signed two Major League players for a total of $32M guaranteed - Atlanta's signed three players for $70.25M, in relievers Pierce Johnson and Joe Jiménez and pitcher Reynaldo López. 

By Spotrac's payroll calculations, Atlanta's currently sitting on the third highest cash payroll at $208.4M and the highest CBT payroll at $242M for 2024. 

Now, the offseason's not over and there's plenty of big dollar free agents like Matt Chapman, Cody Bellinger, and Yoshinobu Yamamoto left to sign, but it's worth repeating: 

The Atlanta Braves, right now, have the third-highest cash payroll and THE highest luxury tax payroll in all of baseball. 

And Atlanta's been active in the trade market, as well, bringing in nine players and shipping out twelve (some of those nine incoming players were almost immediately shipped back out, including Marco Gonzales, Evan White, and Max Stassi). They've taken on multi-millions of dollars in those deals, some of which they've managed to shed. 

Just because you took on money via trade instead of free agency doesn't mean you didn't spend money.

The final result of that, as of now, has been Atlanta's securing five years of outfielder Jarred Kelenic and two years of David Fletcher for just barely more than the club option for one year of Eddie Rosario and two years of arbitration-eligible Nicky Lopez, plus the multi-year additions of several relievers (like Aaron Bummer and Ray Kerr). 

The team is better, whether we want to admit it or not. The bullpen's deeper and the outfield has a higher ceiling with Kelenic (and a strong enough offense to weather any struggles he might have offensively as he adjusts). 

The total cost for Jarred Kelenic comes out to more than Eddie Rosario's $9M option

Why does everyone ignore the Braves large cash payroll amount? 

I think it's down to a few factors: For starters, there's an idea that the Braves underpay anyone that's signed on a long-term contract. And while there's some truth to tha,t from the perspective of Atlanta holding very team-friendly deals on Ronald Acuña Jr (8 years, $100M) and Ozzie Albies (7 years, $35M), several of the Braves long-term deals rise into the $20M+/year range as those players get into bought-out arbitration and free agent years. 

Matt Olson, Austin Riley, and Spencer Strider will all spend multiple years making $22M before their deals expire, with Acuña maxing at $17M, Sean Murphy maxing at $15M, and even newly-signed reliever Reynaldo López receiving $11M in each of 2025 and 2026. 

Fun fact, looking at remaining money on long-term, guaranteed deals, the Braves have the 6th-highest remaining salary commitment in 2026, at over $463M still to be paid on existing contracts (and two of those other teams above Atlanta are in their division, with the Mets at $482M and Philly at $534M.)

The top of the free agent market isn't how Atlanta does business

As much as we want the Braves to go out and sign top free agents when they're available on the open market, that's just not Atlanta's MO. 

The Braves typically avoid signing the big-ticket free agents, for a few reasons. The first is the Qualifying Offer - usually, those free agents have draft pick compensation attached to them, and losing a high draft pick (or two, as Atlanta's paying into the CBT) takes that price even higher. 

A great example of this is Sonny Gray - the 33 year-old signed for three years with the St. Louis Cardinals. Assuming he's still pitching as effectively as he did this last season, he's a free agent again at the same time that those draft picks, were they to be college pitchers, would conceivably be ready to be full-season starters in your rotation. 

For as concerned as we are with the rotation after 2024, with both Max Fried and Charlie Morton becoming free agents, imagine if that was happening and we also didn't have AJ Smith-Shawver and Hurston Waldrep as rotation options to take those innings. 

(Which is also my argument for not overpaying for Dylan Cease from the White Sox, but that's another article). 

But also, in free agency you typically have to overpay in both dollars, years, and contract structure. Most top of the market free agents get a longer deal than would typically be prudent, with several of last year's top-tier free agents signing through age 40 or 41. Do we really think Trea Turner is still going to be an effective shortstop at age 40? Do we really think Aaron Judge will be patrolling right field in his age 41 season? Those deals are overpaying for the back half of a player's prime via multiple seasons of (potentially) dead weight for an aging player. 

Additionally, many of the top tier free agents request and/or require contract language that favors them, whether it be a no-trade clause, an opt-out, or (in the case of Shohei Ohtani), unprecedented deferrals & the ability to opt out of the deal if specific members of the front office or ownership group leave the team. 

Atlanta's doesn't do that stuff - it's why Alex Anthopoulos emphatically came out prior to the Winter Meetings to shoot down the speculation that the Braves would be trading any position players on long-term deals. 

Anthopoulos: Trading players on long-term contracts "will not happen"

No, Alex Anthopoulos has stuck true to form - striking early in the offseason to get his targeted player, and then waiting for the market to settle before coming in closer to Spring Training with "value" contract offers for veterans. 

(The owner's lockout of the players after the 2021 season disrupted that schedule for 2022, with a quick frenzy prior to the lockout and then every other transaction quickly coming together after the CBA was agreed to and before the season began). 

Player	How acquired?	Acquisition Date
Charlie Morton	Free agency	Nov 24, 2020
Matt Olson	Trade	March 14, 2022 (lockout)
Sean Murphy	Trade	Dec 12th, 2022
Jarred Kelenic	Trade	Dec 3, 2023

So Atlanta's going to bring in more players this offseason; that feels like a certainty at this point. 

But the Braves aren't going to go to the top of the market and overpay for a Blake Snell, or possibly even a Jordan Montgomery. That's just not what they do. 

Anthopoulos is working as if he has more financial capital than prospect capital this offseason, preferring to take on bad contracts to get players rather than give up quality prospects. And there's limits to the kinds of deals you can make with that method, but it's a sustainable strategy if you can flip those bad contracts to other teams. 

But more importantly, it doesn't take away from the roster in 2025, or 2026, or beyond. This team is set up to be a sustainable winner for a while. 

Important Braves Today Offseason Stories
2023 MLB Free Agent Rankings
Current Atlanta Braves prospect rankings
Current Atlanta Braves 40-man roster
Key offseason dates for the Atlanta Braves
Projecting the 2024 Atlanta Braves' arbitration salaries

Check out Braves Today on Socials!
Follow Braves Today on Twitter!
Like Braves Today on Facebook!
Check out the homepage for more Atlanta Braves News!
Subscribe to Braves Today on YouTube!
Get Exclusive Braves Merchandise from FOCO